Gesellschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Infrastruktureinrichtungen
SuchenSitemapHilfe
GESIS Servicestelle Osteuropa Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen
Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung, Universität zu Köln

Literatur- & Forschungsinformation

Datenservice & Archivierung

Dauerbeobachtung

Methodenberatung

Forschung & Entwicklung

Software

Publikationen

Zeitschriften & Newsletter

Arbeits- & Forschungsberichte

GESIS-Berichte

IZ Arbeitsberichte

   

ZUMA Arbeitsberichte

2007
2006
2005
2003
2002
2001
1998-2000
1980-1997

ZUMA Methodenberichte

ZUMA How to

Aufsätze & Monographien

 

Bestellen & Downloads

Veranstaltungen

GESIS-Bibliotheken

Linksammlung SocioGuide

 

Kooperationen

Beratung

Mitarbeiter & Adressen

Presse

Organisation

 

Impressum


 

 

 

 

Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck: 
Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice.

ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht Nr. 2001/01

Abstract

In recent years, both mass communication and personal communication have attracted increased interest as sources of persuasive information which influences individual voting decisions. However, few efforts have so far been undertaken to investigate how mass communication and personal communication interact with regard to electoral decision-making. Katz/Lazarsfeld's (1955) 'filter hypothesis' maintains that personal communication mediates the influence of mass communication on individual voters, reinforcing or blocking the impact of media information, depending on the evaluative implications of that information and on the political structure of voters' discussant networks. The paper examines this hypothesis, using comparable national election-survey data from Britain, Spain, the United States and West Germany. Based on detailled information about structures and political content of voters' discussant networks, about their media exposure, and about the content of the media used, the filter hypothesis is empirically corroborated. In addition, qualifications pertaining to the importance of differing formats of party systems are made.

PDF-Datei (313 KB)

Zum Ansehen von PDF-Dateien benötigen Sie den Adobe Acrobat Reader.



© GESIS Kerstin Hollerbach 14.06.2006