|
ISSP Modes
To date the group has made two contributions to ISSP methods.
A modes variable for the ISSPA seven country ISSP modes experiment
Modes background variable
The modes work group developed a background variable for data
collection methods in the ISSP. This became an obligatory variable in
1999; many members included it from their 2000 module on. The options included cover only those methods currently
acceptable within the ISSP framework of a questionnaire printed as a
self-completion format, whether conducted as an interview or not.
Click
here to see details on the modes variable.
International modes experiment in ISSP data collection
In 1996-1997, eight ISSP members co-operated on a research project to
investigate the extent to which modes used to implement ISSP surveys might
affect data. It is sometimes argued, for example, that sensitive
questions are more readily answered in self-completion formats or in
telephone studies than they are in face-to-face studies. This has led to
various techniques being developed to handle sensitive questions in
face-to-face situations. Currently, the modes permitted in the ISSP are
face-to-face and self-completion. According to the rules, the
questionnaire should always be presented in a self-completion format.
The countries involved in the experiment were Canada, Germany, Hungary,
Norway, New Zealand, the Philippines, Slovenia, and the USA. With the
exception of New Zealand, each country fielded the 1996 Role of Government
in two different modes - their normal mode (face-to-face or some form of
self-completion) and another mode. The modes chosen in different countries
depended on what they normally used and what alternative modes could be
operationalised.
The ISSP mode experiment provides cross-cultural information about modes at different
levels. It provides data on data collection and design effects from an
academic survey not designed for experimental purposes. In addition,
participating countries answered a detailed
methodological questionnaire which provides information about how
adaptation from mode to mode was carried out. Findings from the experiment
were presented at AAPOR 2000, Portland and ISA 2000, Cologne. A book chapter on data
collection procedures in the comparative context by Janet Harkness and
Knut Kalgraff Skjåk is published in 2003.
© GESIS Janet Harkness
14.01.04
|