Quelle: European Sociological Review, (2023) XX, S 1–21
Inhalt: Recent evidence suggests that women are more likely to be selected for professorships when they apply. This female advantage may be partly due to the widely promoted gender-equality policy of having a substantial female quota in selection committees. Yet, research has rarely considered whether male and female committee members evaluate applicants for professorships differently. We address this research gap based on a large factorial survey experiment with German university professors from different disciplines. We asked these professors to rate how qualified hypothetical applicants are for full professorships and the likelihood of inviting these applicants for a job interview. We find that female applicants have an modest advantage both in their perceived qualifications and in their likelihood of being invited—with no differences between the male and female professors assessing them. Importantly, however, the female advantage in invitation does not apply to highly qualified female applicants but only to female applicants with low and mediocre perceived qualifications—again, there is no difference between male and female professors. Moreover, our analyses do not indicate a Matilda effect, that is, we do not find a co-authorship penalty for female applicants.
Qualitätssicherung von Gleichstellungsmaßnahmen in der Wissenschaft: Ergebnisse aus dem Projekt StaRQ - Journal Netzwerk Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung NRW
Inhalt: Der vorliegende Beitrag fokussiert auf zentrale Ergebnisse aus dem BMBF-geförderten Projekt StaRQ (2019-2023) und zeigt Perspektiven sowie ausgewählte Erkenntnisse zum Handlungsfeld Geschlechtersensibilisierung auf.
Quelle: J Acad Ethics (Journal of Academic Ethics), 20 (2022) 3, S 437–450
Inhalt: Studies repeatedly find that women and men experience life in academia differently. Importantly, the typical female academic portfolio contains less research but more teaching and administrative duties. The typical male portfolio, on the other hand, contains more research but less teaching and administration. Since previous research has suggested that research is a more valued assignment than teaching in academia, we hypothesise that men will be ranked higher in the peer-evaluations that precede hirings to tenured positions in Swedish academia. We analyze 861 peer review assessments of applicants in 111 recruitment processes in Economics, Political Science, and Sociology at the six largest Swedish universities. Our findings confirm that the premises established in previous research are valid in Sweden too: Women have relatively stronger teaching merits and men relatively stronger research merits, and also that, on balance, research is rewarded more when applicants are ranked by reviewers. Accordingly, male applicants are ranked higher compared to female applicants.
Promoting Diversity but Striving for Excellence: Opening the ‘Black Box’ of Academic Hiring
Autor/in:
Orupabo, Julia; Mangset, Marte
Quelle: Sociology, (2021) , S 1–17
Inhalt: Scholars have described how neutral routines and ‘objective’ criteria in recruitment may result in an institutional preference for certain types of candidates. This article advances the literature on recruitment by conducting an in-depth study of how the criteria for assessing quality are applied in practice in the recruitment process. Through an in-depth study of 48 recruitment cases for permanent academic positions in Norway and 52 qualitative interviews with the recruiters involved, we stress the need to grasp how evaluation is embedded in the organisational process of recruitment. By constructing an ideal type of recruitment process comprising five different steps, we show that despite evaluators including diversity concerns in their search for talent during the first stages of the recruitment process, they end up deploying narrow criteria that tend to favour men in the crucial steps of the recruitment process, in which hiring outcomes are determined.
What professors do in peer review : Interrogating assessment practices in the recruitment of professors in Sweden
Autor/in:
Mählck, Paula; Kusterer, Hanna Li; Montgomery, Henry
Quelle: Gender Work Organ (Gender, Work & Organization), 54 (2020) 2, 9 S
Inhalt: Sweden is known for its political will to gender equality. Sweden is also a country with a strong tradition of transparency in university recruitments. In this article, the assessment practices in the appointment of full professors in one Swedish university are investigated from an intersectional and postcolonial perspective on gender and place/space. Using a multimethod approach to investigate written evaluations of applicants, recruitment group meeting minutes and interviews with reviewers, the results show that there is great variation in how evaluation criteria are applied and filled with meaning. Moreover, in more than half of the appointment decisions the reviewers disagreed. The interview results show a structural bias operating towards researchers applying from non‐Western university contexts. At an aggregated level, national applicants have 3.88 times greater chance to be proposed for a position and national women applicants are the most likely to be proposed for the position.
Schlagwörter:Berufungsverfahren; Gender; intersectionality; intersektionale Perspektive; Intersektionalität; Peer-Review; Schweden; Sweden
CEWS Kategorie:Diversity, Europa und Internationales, Geschlechterverhältnis, Hochschulen, Berufungsverfahren
Quelle: Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 42 (2020) 4, S 94–109
Inhalt: Der Artikel nimmt zentrale Herausforderungen für Gleichstellungsarbeit in der deutschen Universitätsmedizin in den Blick, die auf einer formalstrukturellen Ebene und mit Blick auf organisationale Praktiken erschlossen werden. Auf der Grundlage eines multimethodischen empirischen Designs zeigt er, dass die (mehrheitlich nebenberuflich tätigen) Frauen- und Gleichstellungsbeauftragten mit einem zentralen Widerspruch zwischen einer geringen institutionellen Einbettung und zunehmend komplexen Arbeitsanforderungen konfrontiert sind, die sich aus der gestiegenen Bedeutung von Gleichstellung für eine an wissenschaftlicher Exzellenz und unternehmerischen Rechenschaftspflichten orientierten Hochschulgovernance ergeben. Am Beispiel von Berufungsverfahren wird anhand einer Typologie von Problemlösungsmustern ein vertiefender Einblick in die Arbeitsweise und Befugnisse der Beauftragten gegeben sowie deren organisationales Spannungsfeld zwischen Professionalisierungsanforderungen und tradierter Nischenposition illustriert. Um dieses Spannungsfeld erfolgreich gestalten und wirkungsvoller als bisher die Gleichstellung in der Medizin voranbringen zu können, ist eine strukturelle Stärkung der Position im Rahmen integrierter Organisationsmodelle sowie ein kontinuierlicher Aufbau von Fach- und Handlungswissen der Beauftragten gefordert.1
Quelle: Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 42 (2020) 4, S 50–69
Inhalt: Berufungskommissionen sind wichtige Arenen für die Durchsetzung der Interessen verschiedener Akteure. Sie werden auch in der Gleichstellungspolitik als zentrales Handlungsfeld betrachtet. Im Zentrum des Beitrags steht die Frage, welche Gleich-
stellungsmaßnahmen auf professoraler Ebene, insbesondere im Handlungsfeld Berufungskommissionen, bekannt sind und wie sie angesichts wachsender Ansprüche an exzellente Wissenschaft wahrgenommen und umgesetzt werden. Das Konzept des Geschlechterwissens nach Dölling/Wetterer diente als zentrale theoretische Perspektive. Die leitfadengestützten Interviews wurden rekonstruktiv ausgewertet. Es zeigte sich, dass das Gleichstellungswissen der Interviewten in Bezug auf den Kosmos Hochschule umfangreich ist, ihr Geschlechterwissen jedoch überwiegend alltagsweltlich. Ein zentrales Ergebnis ist, dass die Imperative Gleichstellung und Bestenauswahl in Berufungskommissionen als widersprüchliche Zielvorgaben wahrgenommen werden.
Schlagwörter:Berufungskommission; Genderkompetenz; Geschlechterwissen; Gleichstellungsmaßnahmen; Professor; Professorin
Inhalt: Gender disparities in top-level academic positions are persistent. However, whether bias in recruitment plays a role in producing these disparities remains unclear. This study examines the role of bias in academic recruitment by conducting a large-scale survey experiment among faculty in Economics, Law, Physics, Political Science, Psychology, and Sociology from universities in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. The faculty respondents rated CVs of hypothetical candidates—who were randomly assigned either a male or a female name—for a permanent position as an Associate Professor in their discipline. The results show that, despite the underrepresentation of women in all fields, the female candidates were viewed as both more competent and more hireable compared to their male counterparts. Having children or a stronger CV do not change the overall result. Consequently, biased evaluations of equally qualified candidates to Associate Professor positions do not seem to be the key explanation of the persistent gender gap in academia in the Nordic region.