New publication: Fraser, Mayr & Peters: Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors.


Categories: GESIS-News

Fraser N, Mayr P, Peters I (2022) Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. PLoS ONE 17(11): e0274441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274441

Since 2013, the usage of preprints as a means of sharing research in biology has rapidly grown, in particular via the preprint server bioRxiv. Recent studies have found that journal articles that were previously posted to bioRxiv received a higher number of citations or mentions/shares on other online platforms compared to articles in the same journals that were not posted. However, the exact causal mechanism for this effect has not been established, and may in part be related to authors’ biases in the selection of articles that are chosen to be posted as preprints.

The authors of this article aimed to investigate this mechanism by conducting a mixed-methods survey of 1,444 authors of bioRxiv preprints, to investigate the reasons that they post or do not post certain articles as preprints, and to make comparisons between articles they choose to post and not post as preprints. They find that authors are most strongly motivated to post preprints to increase awareness of their work and increase the speed of its dissemination; conversely, the strongest reasons for not posting preprints centre around a lack of awareness of preprints and reluctance to publicly post work that has not undergone a peer review process.