Research on Representation and Samples
In the field of sampling, we explore strategies to achieve best possible representation of the target population. In this context, data quality refers to the accurate representation of the target population by respondents. Our focus lies on sampling methods and the conditions of data collection or fieldwork conducive to establishing representative data. Additionally, we conduct research on methods to address nonresponse and draw reliable conclusions from surveys despite missing data.
We currently focus on the following areas:
- Nonresponse bias: We delve into identifying personal traits or survey attributes that impact on participation and explore methods to enhance survey participation and to mitigate potential biases.
- Weighting: We develop methods to counterbalance biases arising from high non-response rates within specific demographic groups. We also investigate the computation of design weights for samples that combine multiple sampling frames.
- Imputation: We examine approaches for replacing missing values in survey data as effectively as possible. Our emphasis lies in imputation methods tailored to modular questionnaire designs, where certain items are intentionally presented to subsets of respondents, thereby generating planned missing values. We also conduct research on variance estimation under imputation.
- Respondent recruitment: We explore different approaches to recruiting survey participants and their impact on data quality. This includes innovative methods such as harnessing the potential of social networking sites (e.g., Facebook or Instagram) for recruitment purposes, e.g., for hard-to-reach groups such as refugees.
Research Output
- Axenfeld, Julian B., Christian Bruch, Christof Wolf, and Annelies G. Blom. 2024. “The Performance of Multiple Imputation in Social Surveys with Missing Data from Planned Missingness and Item Nonresponse.” Survey Research Methods 18(2): 137-51. doi: 10.18148/srm/2024.v18i2.8158.
- Bruch, Christian, and Barbara Felderer. 2023. “Applying Multilevel Regression Weighting When Only Population Margins Are Available.” Communications in Statistics – Simulation 52(11): 5401-22. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2021.1988642.
- Christmann, Pablo, Tobias Gummer, Armando Häring, Tanja Kunz, Anne-Sophie Oehrlein, Michael Ruland, and Lisa Schmid. 2024. “Concurrent, Web-First, or Web-Only? How Different Mode Sequences Perform in Recruiting Participants for a Self-Administered Mixed-Mode Panel Study.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 12(3): 532-57. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smae008.
- Felderer, Barbara, Jannis Kück, and Martin Spindler. 2023. “Using Double Machine Learning to Understand Nonresponse in the Recruitment of a Mixed-Mode Online Panel.” Social Science Computer Review 41(2): 461-81. doi: 10.1177/08944393221095194.
- Murray-Watters, Alexander, Stefan Zins, Joseph W. Sakshaug, and Carina Cornesse. 2025. “Averaging Non-Probability Online Surveys to Avoid Maximal Estimation Error.” Journal of Official Statistics: 0282423X241312775. doi: 10.1177/0282423X241312775.
- Prediction-based Adaptive Designs for Panel Surveys (PrADePS). Funded by: DFG.
- Explaining nonresponse and countering nonresponse bias in self-administered panel surveys (ENCONOBS). Funded by: DFG.
- The Competence Center Data Quality in the Social Sciences (KODAQS). Funded by: BMBF.
- Challenges and Potentials of Capturing Short-term Dynamics of Attitude Development through Smartphone-based Intensive Longitudinal Methods in Public Opinion Research (SmartDyn). Funded by: DFG.
- Survey Data Collection and the Covid-19 Pandemic (SDCCP). Funded by: BMBF.