Ein probabilistisches Mixed-Mode Access Panel
für die Sozialwissenschaften

Bibliography

The GESIS Panel-Bibliography contains all the publications using GESIS Panel data. To keep the bibliography complete and up-to-date, we kindly request the users of GESIS Panel data to inform us on their publications. Please send us details of your research using GESIS Panel data at bibliography(at)gesis-panel(dot)org.


2017

Bosnjak, M., Dannwolf, T., Enderle, T., Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B., Tanner, A., & Weyandt, K. W. (2017). Establishing an Open Probability-Based Mixed-Mode Panel of the General Population in Germany: The GESIS Panel. Social Science Computer Review. doi.org/10.1177/0894439317697949

Cheng, K. H. C. (2017). Decoupling the Effects of Wayfinding Competence, Trait-Anxiety and Subjective Well-Being from a GESIS German Sample. Current Psychology. doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9602-z

Gherghina, S., & Geissel, B. (2017). Linking Democratic Preferences and Political Participation: Evidence from Germany. Political Studies, 65(1_suppl), 24–42. doi.org/10.1177/0032321716672224

Landwehr, C., Faas, T., & Harms, P. (2017). Bröckelt der Verfahrenskonsens? Einstellungen zu politischen Entscheidungen und demokratischen Entscheidungsverfahren in Zeiten des Populismus. Leviathan, 45(1), 35–54. doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2017-1-35

Mayer, S. J. (2017). Die Parteiidentifikation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15672-5

Schmidt, P., & Weick, S. (2017). Kontakte und die Wahrnehmung von Bedrohungen besonders wichtig für die Einschätzung von Migranten: Einstellungen der deutschen Bevölkerung zu Zuwanderern von 1980 bis 2016. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren, 57, 1–7. 

2016

Beierlein, C., Kuntz, A., & Davidov, E. (2016). Universalism, conservation and attitudes toward minority groups. Social Science Research, 58, 68–79. doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.02.002

Bischoff, I., & Kusa, N. (2016). Citizens’ preferences for a tax exemption for caregiving heirs: An empirical analysis. Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, (21). Retrieved from hdl.handle.net/10419/144686

Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A.-S., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8–25. doi.org/10.1177/0894439315574825

Breyer, B., & Bluemke, M. (2016). Deutsche Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule PANAS (GESIS Panel). ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. doi.org/10.6102/zis242

Danner, D., Treiber, L., & Bosnjak, M. (2016). Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Short Version of the Time Perspective Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1–11. doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000382

Djuric, U., & Neugart, M. (2016). Helicopter Money: Survey Evidence on Expectation Formation and Consumption Behavior. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm

Fritz, K. (2016). Entstehungsmechanismen von Panel Conditioning in wiederholten Befragungen Eine Untersuchung mit Daten des GESIS-Panels (Masterarbeit). Universität Kassel, Kassel.

Herbach, L. (2016). Entstehungsursachen von Response Effects: Die relative Erklärungskraft der Satisficing-Theorie und der Wirkung von Konversationsnormen (Masterarbeit). Universität Kassel, Kassel.

Horner, A. (2016). L’influence du statut social sur l’attitude politique individuelle à l’égard de l’immigration (Bachelorarbeit). Universität Freiburg, Freiburg.

Jungermann, N. (2016). Survey-Satisficing und Item-Nonresponse in selbstadministrierten Befragungen (Masterarbeit). Universität Kassel, Kassel.

Landwehr, C., & Faas, T. (2016). Who wants democratic innovations, and why? Discussion Papers of Our Gutenberg School of Management and Economics (GSME), (1705). Retrieved from wiwi.uni-mainz.de/Papers/Discussion_Paper_1705.pdf

Landwehr, C., & Steiner, N. D. (2016). Where democrats disagree: citizens’ normative conceptions of democracy. Presented at the 24th World Congress of Political Science of the International Political Science Association (IPSA), Poznań.

Mayer, S. J. (2016). Welche Faktoren beeinflussen die Wahlentscheidung mehrfacher Parteianhänger? Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/profile/Sabrina_Mayer/publication/311440509_Welche_Faktoren_beeinflussen_die_Wahlentscheidung_mehrfacher_Parteianhanger/links/5846a03a08ae8e63e62e7514/Welche-Faktoren-beeinflussen-die-Wahlentscheidung-mehrfacher-Parteianhaenger.pdf

Münzer, S., Fehringer, B. C. O. F., & Kühl, T. (2016a). Standardized norm data for three self-report scales on egocentric and allocentric environmental spatial strategies. Data in Brief, 8, 803–811. doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.06.039

Münzer, S., Fehringer, B. C. O. F., & Kühl, T. (2016b). Validation of a 3-factor structure of spatial strategies and relations to possession and usage of navigational aids. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 66–78. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.017

Neumann, R., & Mehlkop, G. (2016). Pro-Environmental Behavior in High Cost Situations - Evidence from a Mixed-Mode Panel in Germany. Presented at the Third ISA Forum of Sociology, Wien. Retrieved from isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/forum2016/webprogram/Paper82222.html

Struminskaya, B. (2016). Respondent Conditioning in Online Panel Surveys: Results of Two Field Experiments. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 95–115. doi.org/10.1177/0894439315574022

2015

Gherghina, S., & Geissel, B. (2015). Citizens Conceptions of Democracy and Political Participation in Germany. In What Citizens Want From Democracy: Popular Attitudes to Existing Political Processes and their Alternatives. Warschau. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588474

Poggio, T., Bosnjak, M., & Weyandt, K. (2015). Survey Participation via Mobile Devices in a Probability-based Online-Panel: Prevalence, Determinants, and Implications for Nonresponse. Survey Practice, 8(2). Retrieved from www.surveypractice.org/index.php/SurveyPractice/article/view/271

Struminskaya, B., De Leeuw, E., & Kaczmirek, L. (2015). Mode System Effects in an Online Panel Study: Comparing a Probability-based Online Panel with two Face-to-Face Reference Surveys. Methods, Data, Analyses, 9(1), 3–56. doi.org/10.12758/mda.2015.001

Struminskaya, B., Weyandt, K., & Bosnjak, M. (2015). The Effects of Questionnaire Completion Using Mobile Devices on Data Quality. Evidence from a Probability-based General Population Panel. Methoden-Daten-Analysen (MDA), 9(2), 261–292. doi.org/10.12758/mda.2015.014

Werneburg, M. (2015). Einfluss der Nutzung von Internetseiten auf die Pflege von Freundschaftsnetzwerken (Bachelorarbeit). Universität Mannheim, Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften, Mannheim.

2014

Beierlein, C., Asbrock, F., Kauff, M., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3): ein ökonomisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung dreier Subdimensionen autoritärer Einstellungen. GESIS - Leibniz-Institut Für Sozialwissenschaften (GESIS-Working Papers 2014/35). Retrieved from www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/42671/ssoar-2014-beierlein_et_al-Die_Kurzskala_Autoritarismus_KSA-3_Ein.pdf

Struminskaya, B. (2014). Data quality in probability-based online panels: Nonresponse, attrition, and panel conditioning. Utrecht University.

Struminskaya, B., Kaczmirek, L., Schaurer, I., & Bandilla, W. (2014). Assessing representativeness of a probability-based online panel in Germany. In Online panel research: A data quality perspective (pp. 61–85).

2013

Bosnjak, M., Poggio, T., Becker, K. R., Funke, F., Wachenfeld, A., & Fischer, B. (2013). Online survey participation via mobile devices. Presented at the 68th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Boston. Retrieved from www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/AnnualMeetingProceedings/2013/Session_I-5-2-Bosnjak.pdf

We kindly ask you to include the correct reference information (Date file version and DOI) on all used data of the GESIS Panel in your publication (more information: DBK “Bibliographic Citation”).