Intersectional barriers to women’s advancement in higher education institutions rewarded for their gender equity plans
Autor/in:
Crimmins, Gail; Casey, Sarah; Tsouroufli, Maria
Quelle: Gender & Education, (2023) , S 1–18
Inhalt: This paper reports on a research project designed to understand the work experiences and career opportunities of people working in higher education institutions (HEIs) across the UK, which received formal recognition for supporting gender equity between 2015 and 2020. The findings reveal multiple intersecting barriers to women’s full engagement, inclusion, support and career success in higher education, despite the implementation of organization-based gender equity plans, and institutional inter/national recognition for advancing equity. Most axes of de/privilege that are based along lines of gender, race, ethnicity and religion are enacted as everyday sexism that resist gender equality policy. Moreover, our findings suggest that ‘place’ is a constitutive element of intersectional dis/advantage, not merely a context within which compounded barriers to inclusion and advancement may exist. In addition, the findings demonstrate that whilst inter-categorical intersectionality is based on the notion that all social categories (such as age, race and gender) are equally salient, the degree of importance of any category will likely depend on location or context of the phenomena being examined. Our findings therefore invite further, iterative and translocational research into the impacts of the intersections of gender, ethnicity, race and religion in spaces of higher education, particularly those with colonial legacies and presence.
Schlagwörter:Athena SWAN; career development; gender equality plan; gender equality policy; Gleichstellungsplan; Gleichstellungspolitik; Great Britain; higher education; Hochschule; intersectionality; microaggression; Organisation; sexism; spatial analysis; UK
Quelle: icgr (International Conference on Gender Research), 5 (2022) 1, S 1–10
Inhalt: Gender Budgeting is a tool to apply the gender mainstreaming perspective to the accountability process in order to give evidence of the unequal distribution of public resources between women and men. Academic Housekeeping is any task “low-status, time-consuming, largely invisible, and that nevertheless needs to be done” (Kalm, 2019) in the academic daily business. It is a source of gender inequality since it is largely ascribed to women. Money and time are two sides of the same coin of Gender Inequality in Academia and therefore need to be identified and managed with an holistic approach that recognizes the interconnections between them. The results chain of the Performance-Oriented budgeting approach is therefore used to describe the transformation of the budget for salaries into the value of researchers’ work through time, activities, products and results. In this process, Academic Housekeeping emerges as a matter of Gender Budgeting, too. Literature describes Academic Housekeeping as an inequality regime echoing the domestic sphere and bringing its biases and limitations to the scientific race of competitiveness. The Housekeeping tasks are assigned largely arbitrarily and with unintentional side-effects. Its negative gender impact on women’s career is also clearly recognized by four main studies, in every field and with further intersectional spill overs. Gender Budgeting reports in Academia therefore do need to embed a Gender impact assessment of Academic Housekeeping in every step of the main methodologies adopted: Identity, Context Analysis, Planning Analysis, Budget Reclassification, Implementation and Performance Audit. The conceptual framework that emerges from the paper confirms the benefits that might arise from further researches on this field. The paper stems from the LeTSGEPs European Horizon Project (Leading Towards Sustainable Gender Equality Plans RPOs)
Die Digitalisierung kann die Vereinbarkeit und die Gleichstellung voranbringen - vorausgesetzt, sie wird aktiv gestaltet
Autor/in:
Borioli Sandoz, Valérie
Quelle: Frauenfragen - Questions au féminin, (2020) , S 34–37
Inhalt: Vielen macht die Digitalisierung der Arbeit Angst, denn sie ist unberechenbar. Gleichzeitig bietet sie aber auch Chancen. Wird die Digitalisierung gestaltet und begleitet, kann sie helfen, aktuelle Ungleichheiten zwischen Frauen und Männern zu beseitigen. Die Corona-Krise könnte demnach - als Treiberin der Digitalisierung - einen Beitrag zum Abbau der geschlechterspezifischen Arbeitsteilung leisten.
Gender equality regimes and evaluation regimes in Europe and their implications for policy design and evaluation
Autor/in:
Reidl, Sybille; Beranek, Sarah; Holzinger, Florian; Streicher, Jürgen
Quelle: Evaluation and program planning, 83 (2020)
Inhalt: Purpose
This article starts from the assumption that it is important for the evaluation of gender equality interventions in RTDI (Research, Technology Development and Innovation) to consider its context regarding gender equality regime and evaluation culture because this context does influence effects and long term impacts of such activities. It aims to provide key characteristics for the differentiation of gender equality regimes and evaluation regimes to be considered when designing policy interventions or evaluating specific gender equality interventions in RTDI.
Design/methodology/approach
After a literature review of relevant typologies for welfare state and gender equality regimes, it was analysed to which extent the seven EFFORTI countries correspond to certain typologies based on the data basis of the context research performed in the EFFORTI project. For this context research, international/national and qualitative/quantitative data regarding the relevant framework conditions were firstly collected for each of the EFFORTI countries and secondly compared in a cross-country analysis.
Findings
The research showed that when it comes to gender equality policies, most EFFORTI countries can either be assigned to the Social-Democratic category or Conservative Equal Employment Regime category in the typology of von Wahl (2005), with the latter type tending to provide less favourable conditions for women in the general labour market as well as women in RTDI (e.g. overtime culture). In how far these different types of context can have an impact on the evaluation of interventions can be exemplarily illustrated using case studies carried out as part of EFFORTI. Connecting the typologies for gender equality policy with evaluation regimes has not proved fruitful, as the two discourses have only begun to converge in recent years. The evaluation regimes and cultures of the respective countries have therefore been described independently. However, it was shown that countries with more expertise in certain areas (e.g. gender, evaluations) developed more routinized and institutionalised procedures in the respective field.
Originality/value
Considering the different framework conditions is relevant when it comes to evaluation as different national contexts might require different policy and designs of activities, but might also shape the interventions’ effects. This article therefore aims to provide support in this regard for future evaluations of gender policies.
Dual-anonymization Yields Promising Results for Reducing Gender Bias : A Naturalistic Field Experiment of Applications for Hubble Space Telescope Time
Autor/in:
Johnson, Stefanie K.; Kirk, Jessica F.
Quelle: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132 (2020) 1009
Inhalt: Using archival data, we examine the effects of the Hubble Space Telescope Time Allocation Committee (HST TAC)’s decision to adopt a dual- rather than single-anonymous review process. The change involved removing, to varying degrees, information about the Principal Investigator (PI) with the goal of reducing bias against women. Proposals led by female PIs were significantly more likely to be accepted in the five cycles following the changes compared to the 11 cycles using a single-anonymous review system. Taking a closer look at why these changes emerged, we examined data at the reviewer-level in the cycle immediately preceding the change compared to three of the cycles after the change. We found that male reviewers rated female PIs significantly worse than they rated male PIs before, but not after, dual-anonymization was adopted.
Inhalt: SUMMARYThe percentage of women employed in professional scientific positions has been low but is increasing over time. The U.S. National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have both implemented programs to improve women's participation in science, and many universities and companies have diversity and equity programs. While most faculty and scientists believe that they are fair and unbiased, numerous well-designed studies published in leading peer-reviewed journals show that gender bias in sciences and medicine is widespread and persistent today in both faculty and students. Recent studies show that gender bias affects student grading, professional hiring, mentoring, tenure, promotion, respect, grant proposal success, and pay. In addition, sexual harassment remains a significant barrier. Fortunately, several studies provide evidence that programs that raise conscious awareness of gender bias can improve equity in science, and there are a number of recommendations and strategies for improving the participation of women.
Schlagwörter:Forschungsförderung; Frauen in der Wissenschaft; gender bias; Geschlechterverhältnis; Gleichstellungsmaßnahmen; Gleichstellungspolitik; Medizin; Mentoring; Personalrekrutierung; USA; Wissenschaftskarriere
Rezension zu : Mike Laufenberg, Martina Erlemann, Maria Norkus, Grit Petschick (Hg.): Prekäre Gleichstellung. Geschlechtergerechtigkeit, soziale Ungleichheit und unsichere Arbeitsverhältnisse in der Wissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2018 - Querelles-net, Jg. 20, Nr. 3 (2019)
Autor/in:
Mauer, Heike
Quelle: (2019)
Inhalt: Umfassend werden hier das Verhältnis von prekären Arbeitsverhältnissen und Diskriminierungs- und Ungleichheitsstrukturen in der Wissenschaft sowie Gleichstellungspolitiken in den Blick genommen. Die Autor_innen plädieren dafür, die Ökonomisierung von Bildung, die Herausbildung der unternehmerischen Hochschule sowie die damit einhergehende Ausbreitung unsicherer Arbeitsverhältnisse in der Wissenschaft mit Prozessen der Gleichstellungsgovernance sowie der Transformation von Geschlechterverhältnissen und insbesondere von Rassismus an der Hochschule zusammenzudenken. In 12 Beiträgen werden diesbezügliche Ambivalenzen thematisiert und Interventionsmöglichkeiten, um Geschlechtergerechtigkeit, eine nicht-rassistische Hochschule und sichere Beschäftigungsverhältnisse zu verwirklichen, diskutiert.
‘If you put pressure on yourself to produce then that's your responsibility’ : Mothers’ experiences of maternity leave and flexible work in the neoliberal university
Quelle: Gender Work Organ (Gender, Work & Organization), 26 (2019) 6, S 772–788
Inhalt: Women remain underrepresented in senior positions within universities and report barriers to career progression. Drawing on the concepts of Foucault and Bourdieu, with an emphasis on technologies of the self, this article aims to understand mothers’ academic career experiences. Interviews were conducted with 35 non‐STEMM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine) academics in Scotland and Australia, to reveal the gender dimensions of parents’ academic careers, in neoliberal university contexts. The data suggest that there are tensions between organizational policies, such as maternity leave and flexible work, and the contemporary demands of academic labour. New managerial discourses which individualize and make use of moral systems are particularly effectual in driving women to take up marketized research activity and compromise leave entitlements.
Geschlechterquoten im europäischen Vergleich : Harte Sanktionen bei Nichteinhaltung sind am wirkungsvollsten
Autor/in:
Arndt, Paula; Wrohlich, Katharina
Quelle: DIW Wochenbericht, (2019) 38, S 691–698
Inhalt: Frauen sind in Spitzengremien der Wirtschaft nach wie vor stark unterrepräsentiert – in Deutschland, in Europa und auch weltweit. In den Aufsichtsräten der 200 umsatzstärksten Unternehmen in Deutschland lag der Frauenanteil zuletzt bei knapp 27 Prozent, in den Vorständen sogar nur bei neun Prozent.info Auch in anderen Bereichen wie Politik, Wissenschaft und Medien sind Frauen nach wie vor seltener vertreten als Männer. So beträgt beispielsweise der Frauenanteil unter den Abgeordneten im Deutschen Bundestag aktuell 31,2 Prozent;info an den größten deutschen Hochschulen liegt der Anteil der Professorinnen bei 23 Prozent.info
In den vergangenen Jahren hat die Aufmerksamkeit für dieses Thema stark zugenommen. Beispiele dafür sind die Berichterstattungen zum „Thomas-Kreislauf“ oder zur „Hans-Bremse“.info Durch diese öffentliche Debatte steigt seit einigen Jahren der Druck auf die Politik, den Ungleichheiten zwischen Frauen und Männern in Führungspositionen entgegen zu wirken. Viele Länder in Europa haben gesetzlich verbindliche Geschlechterquoten für Spitzengremien in der Wirtschaft eingeführt. Deutschland hat dazu im Jahr 2015 das Gesetz für die gleichberechtigte Teilhabe von Frauen und Männern an Führungspositionen in der Privatwirtschaft und im öffentlichen Dienst (FüPoG) verabschiedet.info Auch für andere Bereiche werden ähnliche Quoten gefordert, beispielsweise für Führungspositionen in deutschen Medien,info in der Wissenschaftinfo oder in der Medizin.info Auch für die Politik werden Geschlechterquoten seit längerem diskutiert. Als erster deutscher Landtag hat Brandenburg im Januar 2019 das sogenannte Paritätsgesetz verabschiedet. Dieses sieht vor, dass alle Parteien, die an der Landtagswahl 2024 teilnehmen wollen, ihre Kandidatenlisten abwechselnd mit Männern und Frauen besetzen müssen.info Auch in Thüringen wurde im Juli 2019 ein solches Gesetz für den Landtag beschlossen.info In einigen europäischen Ländern (darunter Belgien, Frankreich, Portugal, Spanien und Slowenien) gelten Gesetze zu Geschlechterquoten für Kandidatenlisten auch auf nationaler Ebene.info