Wider die Feminisierung der Öffentlichkeit : Aktuelle Geschlechterordnungen in Journalismus und Politik
Titelübersetzung:Against the feminization of the public : current gender orders in journalism and politics
Autor/in:
Lünenborg, Margreth; Maier, Tanja
Quelle: Feministische Studien : Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Jg. 32 (2014) Nr. 2, S. 234-248
Schlagwörter:Öffentlichkeit; Geschlechterverhältnis; Journalismus; Politik; Berichterstattung; Männlichkeit; Politiker
CEWS Kategorie:Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Geschlechterverhältnis
Dokumenttyp:Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Die Relevanz der Kategorie Geschlecht bei schulischen Regulationen von Verletzbarkeit
Titelübersetzung:The role of gender in regulations of vulnerability at schools
Autor/in:
Fritzsche, Bettina
Quelle: Feministische Studien : Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Jg. 29 (2011) Nr. 2, S. 280-292
Inhalt: "The paper focuses the handling of vulnerability within schools. A theoretical perspective is introduced, which, following Judith Butler, emphasises that vulnerability is regulated by norms of recognition. By reference to this concept, an empirical example is analysed: The discussion about the 'malpractice' of a pupil during the class council in a primary school is interpreted as to how the involved persons address each other, how they are subjected and which norms of recognition are of relevance in constituting vulnerability. Finally conclusions concerning the role of gender in regulations of vulnerability at schools are discussed." (author's abstract)
CEWS Kategorie:Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Geschlechterverhältnis, Bildung und Erziehung
Dokumenttyp:Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Die Macht der Kategorien : kritische Überlegungen zur Intersektionalität
Titelübersetzung:The power of categories : critical reflections on intersectionality
Autor/in:
Purtschert, Patricia; Meyer, Katrin
Quelle: Feministische Studien : Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Jg. 28 (2010) Nr. 1, S. 130-142
Inhalt: "In the German speaking area, debates on Intersectionality' constitute one of the most interesting research areas in contemporary women and gender studier. In this context, rate, class and gender are often considered to be the 'master categories' that represent the most relevant social differences. In contrast, we argue that it is impossible to determine the framework of any intersectional analysis by a predefined number of categories. This can be shown on historical, theoretical and political grounds: First, a reflection on the genealogy of feminist theory shows how crucial critical interventions have been for its development. Second, if an intersectional analysis does not problematize its own exclusions, it disregards its own insights into the functionality of power. And finally, the openness to new and different positions can be seen as a basis for a feminist solidarity beyond the logic of sameness." (author's abstract)
CEWS Kategorie:Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Geschlechterverhältnis
Dokumenttyp:Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Soziale Homogentiät und kulturelle Hegemonie : Ausschließung und Organisation aus Bourdieuscher Perspektive
Titelübersetzung:Social homogeneity and cultural hegemony : exclusion and organization from a Bourdieusian perspective
Autor/in:
Hofbauer, Johanna
Quelle: Feministische Studien : Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Jg. 28 (2010) Nr. 1, S. 25-39
Inhalt: "Scholars in the fields of Feminist studies and diversity research have argued that social homogeneity of top management (majority of upper class white men), is an important cause for, not only a consequence of, social exclusion in modern organization. The article takes up on the argument of social homogeneity accounting for cultural hegemony in institutions, with an attempt to Show the use of Pierre Bourdieu's approaches to social inequality and symbolic domination. Bourdieu has only recently been 'discovered' by organization studies, explaining for the range of open theoretical questions as well as the lack of comprehensive empirical research. This said, the article still attempts to demonstrate how Bourdieusian concepts such as social distinction, organization field, capital, habitus and symbolic violence already now add to our understanding of exclusion in modern organization." (author's abstract)