Herausforderungen und Potentiale geschlechtsspezifischer Gesundheitsversorgung: 3. Bundeskongress Gender-Gesundheit vom 21. bis 22. Mai 2015 in der Landesvertretung Baden-Württemberg, Berlin
Titelübersetzung:Challenges and Potentials of Gender-Specific Health Care: Third Federal Congress Gender Health, 21/22 May 2015, Representation of Baden-Württemberg to the Federation, Berlin
Autor/in:
Hendrix, Ulla; Hilgemann, Meike; Niegel, Jennifer
Quelle: GENDER - Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft, 7 (2015) 3, S 143-148
Inhalt: Der dritte Bundeskongress Gender-Gesundheit fand im Mai 2015 in Berlin statt. Das Schwerpunktthema der diesjährigen Tagung lautete "Gender und Diabetes". Auf dem Kongress wurde die Notwendigkeit einer geschlechterunterscheidenden Betrachtung der Medizin hervorgehoben und es wurden praktische und politische Implikationen für eine bessere medizinische Versorgung diskutiert.
Inhalt: The Third Federal Congress Gender Health was held in Berlin in May 2015. The main top ic of the conference was "Gender and Diabetes". The congress highlighted the gender-differentiated perspective on medicine and discussed practical and political implications for better medical care.
Quelle: Journal of Public Health, 19 (2010) 3, S 269-280
Inhalt: Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of primary family caregivers in comparison to the reference values of the average population. Subjects and methods: Data collection took place in the Werra-Meißner district in 2009 with a response rate of 102 primary family caregivers of frail elderly people. The health-related quality of life was measured with the Short Form 36 health survey (SF 36) and compared with the German reference values. Results: Compared to the health values of the normative sample, primary caregivers show significantly lower rates in all dimensions of health-related quality of life. In particular, caregivers between the ages of 53 to 61 report extremely low health values. Caregiving women compared to non-caregiving women have highly significant differences in all subscales of the SF 36. Caregiving men also report highly significant differences to non-caregiving men in all dimensions of the SF 36 except for Physical Functioning and General Health (p < 0.01). Caregivers in general and especially caregiving women aged 53 to 61 (midlife) were identified as at-risk groups for poor health. The latter report lower vitality and well-being, which may be a consequence of both social isolation and social impacts from multiple role demands. Conclusion: The identified high-risk groups of family caregivers, caregivers in midlife and especially caregiving women in midlife, should be supported by social measures, e.g., training courses for family caregivers, particularly in their home setting, and various types of respite care in order to sustain their health.
Schlagwörter:psychische Belastung; Gesundheit; alter Mensch; family member; Lebensqualität; Hessen; risk; health consequences; Federal Republic of Germany; häusliche Pflege; nursing care for the elderly; psychological stress; quality of life; Auswirkung; Risiko; home care; Krankheit; Altenpflege; Hesse; impact; elderly; gesundheitliche Folgen; gender-specific factors; health; Familienangehöriger; illness; family caregiver; health-related quality of life; SF 36; gender differences