Inhalt: When it comes to gender equity in the workplace, many organizations focus largely on hiring more women. But to achieve more equitable representation, it’s also critical to examine disparities in how employees are evaluated and promoted once they’re on board. In this piece, the authors discuss their recent research on this topic, which found that competitive evaluation systems in which employees are ranked against one another can cause men to perform better and women to perform worse (on a task for which their performance would otherwise be roughly the same). They suggest that this likely stems from deeply-ingrained stereotypes that lead men to believe they are better than women in competitive environments, and that lead women to prioritize avoiding harming others. Based on these findings, the authors argue that organizations should build awareness of the potential harms of ranking employees, and that they should consider either adapting or totally overhauling existing performance evaluation systems to focus more on individual progress, and less on social comparisons.
Mentoring as affective governmentality: Shame, (un)happiness, and the (re)production of masculine leadership
Autor/in:
Sandager, Jette
Quelle: Gend Work Organ (Gender, Work and Organization), (2021)
Inhalt: This article contributes to current discussions on the effectiveness of mentoring as a gender equality tool, but also focuses on the emotions and bodily (dis)comforts mentoring produces in addition to linguistic discourses, thus offering a novel take on how the tool operates. Drawing on a case study of a Danish mentoring program aimed at establishing the organizational space of leadership as more gender equal, the article demonstrates how, in producing shame and (un)happiness, mentoring (re)produces leadership as an organizational space dominated by masculine norms and work practices. The findings of the article support literature arguing that mentoring is an ineffective gender equality tool. However, the article does not entirely discard mentoring for this purpose, instead suggesting that scholars and practitioners look to literature on queered forms of mentoring for inspiration on how to use mentoring as a tool that carries the potential of truly promoting gender equality.
Sounds like a fit! : Wording in recruitment advertisements and recruiter gender affect women's pursuit of career development programs via anticipated belongingness
Inhalt: Following calls for research to increase gender equality, we investigated women's intentions to pursue career opportunities, in the form of career development programs. We built on lack of fit and signaling theory to argue that women's but not men's pursuit of career opportunities would be influenced by recruiter gender and gender-stereotypical wording in recruitment advertisements. We conducted two studies in Germany. In Study 1 (video-based experiment with 329 university students), we found that when a male recruiter used stereotypically masculine compared to feminine wording, female students anticipated lower belongingness, expected lower success of an application, and indicated lower application intentions for career opportunities. These differences in female students’ evaluations disappeared when the recruiter was female. While Study 2 (experimental vignette study with 545 employees) replicates the negative effects of masculine wording for female employees; the buffering effect of female recruiters was only replicated for younger, but not for older female employees. Women's anticipated belongingness mediated the relationship between advertisement wording and application intentions when the recruiter was male. Recruiter gender and wording had no effects on men. Our work contributes to a better understanding of when and why contextual characteristics in the recruitment process influence women's pursuit of career opportunities.
Explaining the gender pay gap among doctoral graduates: analyses of the German labour market
Autor/in:
Goldan, Lea
Quelle: European Journal of Higher Education, 11 (2021) 2, S 137–159
Inhalt: Previous research has shown that female doctoral graduates earn less than male doctoral graduates; however, there has been little research on the determinants of this gender pay gap. This paper investigates the determinants of the gender pay gap among doctoral graduates in Germany. By relying on human capital theory, traditional gender roles and beliefs, and previous empirical findings, I examine gender differences in doctoral and occupational characteristics as potential determinants of the gender pay gap. I use data from a representative German panel study of the 2014 doctoral graduation cohort. Regression analyses on the logarithmic gross monthly earnings reveal that female graduates earn 30.4% less than male graduates five years after graduation. This gender pay gap is driven by a substantive wage premium for male doctoral graduates outside academia. Important determinants of the overall gender pay gap are doctoral subjects, professional experience after graduation, industries, management positions, and, above all, working hours. However, the considered determinants only partially explain the gender pay gap, as it remains substantial and statistically significant. The paper enhances the research on gender inequalities in post-doctoral careers and offers new insights into the determinants of the gender pay gap among doctoral graduates.
The Gender Wage Gap among Ph.D. Holders: Evidence from Italy
Autor/in:
Alfano, Vincenzo; Cicatiello, Lorenzo; Gaeta, Giuseppe Lucio; Pinto, Mauro
Quelle: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 21 (2021) 3, S 1107–1148
Inhalt: This paper contributes to the literature on the gender wage gap by empirically analyzing those workers who hold the highest possible educational qualification, i.e., a Ph.D. The analysis relies on recent Italian cross-sectional data collected through a survey on the employment conditions of Ph.D. holders. The Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition analysis and quantile decomposition analysis are carried out, and the selection of Ph.D. holders into employment and STEM/non-STEM fields of specialization is taken into account. Findings suggest that a gender gap in hourly wages exists among Ph.D. holders, with sizeable differences by sector of employment and field of specialization.
Schlagwörter:gender pay gap; Italien; Italy; Phd; Post-doc; science as a profession; STEM; wissenschaftliche Karriere
CEWS Kategorie:Arbeitswelt und Arbeitsmarkt, Naturwissenschaft und Technik, Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Wissenschaft als Beruf
Lohngerechtigkeit und Geschlechternormen: Erhalten Männer eine Heiratsprämie?
Autor/in:
Jann, Ben; Zimmermann, Barbara; Diekmann, Andreas
Quelle: KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie), 73 (2021) 2, S 201–229
Inhalt: Der geschlechtsspezifische Lohnunterschied hat sich in der Schweiz ebenso wie in Deutschland in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten zwar leicht verringert, die Lücke ist aber immer noch beträchtlich und lässt sich nur zum Teil durch produktivitätsrelevante Faktoren erklären. Um zu untersuchen, ob sich ein entsprechender „gender wage gap“ auch darin wiederfindet, welche Löhne als gerecht angesehen werden, haben wir im Rahmen von Schweizer Bevölkerungsumfragen drei randomisierte Vignettenexperimente durchgeführt. Im Unterschied zu den meisten anderen Experimenten wurde den Befragten nur jeweils eine Vignette vorgelegt, um Einflüsse sozialer Wünschbarkeit zu vermindern. Das erste Experiment belegt eine geschlechtsspezifische Doppelmoral bei der Einkommensbewertung: Bei Männern wurde ein gegebenes Einkommen eher als zu gering beurteilt als bei Frauen. Der Befund konnte in einem zweiten Experiment mit ähnlichem Design jedoch nicht repliziert werden, wobei ein zentraler Unterschied zwischen den beiden Experimenten in dem in den Vignetten beschriebenen Haushaltskontext lag. In einem dritten Experiment haben wir deshalb den Einfluss der familiären Situation systematisch untersucht. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass nur bei verheirateten Personen ein Unterschied zwischen Frauen und Männern gemacht wird, nicht jedoch bei Singles. Im Einklang mit dem Stereotyp des männlichen Haupternährers zeigt sich ein ausgeprägter Effekt einer „Heiratsprämie“. Verheirateten Männern wird in der Wahrnehmung der Bevölkerung bei sonst gleichen Merkmalen ein höherer Lohn zugestanden als verheirateten Frauen.
Although the gender wage gap has narrowed somewhat in Switzerland, as in Germany, over the past two decades, the gap is still substantial and can only be partly explained by productivity-related factors. To investigate whether a corresponding gender wage gap is also reflected in what wages are considered fair, we conducted three randomized vignette experiments in Swiss population surveys. Unlike most other such experiments, each respondent was presented only one vignette to reduce social desirability bias. The first experiment provides evidence of a double standard in income evaluation: A given income was judged more likely to be too low for men than for women. However, the finding could not be replicated in a second experiment with a similar design. Because a key difference between the two experiments was the household context described in the vignettes, we systematically examined the influence of the family situation in a third experiment. The results show that a difference between women and men is made only for married individuals and not for singles. Consistent with the stereotype of the male breadwinner, a pronounced effect of a “marriage premium” for men emerges. Married men are perceived to be entitled to higher wages than married women, other things being equal.
Drehtür-Effekt im deutschen Hochschulsystem? : Bildungswege nach dem Abbruch geschlechtsatypischer Studiengänge
Autor/in:
Meyer, Jasmin; Mantinger, Mara
Quelle: Soziale Welt, 72 (2021) 1, S 27–54
Inhalt: Die bisherige Forschung zeigt, dass Studierende in geschlechtsatypischen Studiengängen ihr Studium häufiger vorzeitig beenden als Studierende in geschlechtstypischen oder -neutralen Studiengängen. Ungeklärt ist bisher, ob sie nach dem Verlassen dieser Studiengänge auch das geschlechtsatypische Bildungsumfeld an sich verlassen und welche Mechanismen diese Entscheidung erklären. Die empirische Analyse dieser Frage erfolgt auf Grundlage der Exmatrikuliertenbefragung des Deutschen Zentrums für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW) der Jahre 2014 und 2017. Dabei zeigt sich, dass die Mehrheit der Studierenden nach dem Abbruch eines geschlechtsatypischen Studiengangs das geschlechtsatypische Bildungsumfeld verlässt. Bei Frauen bewirken insbesondere Zweifel an ihrer Eignung für das jeweilige Studienfach, dass sie einen geschlechtstypischen oder -neutralen Bildungsweg einem geschlechtsatypischen vorziehen. Jene Frauen, denen das gesellschaftliche Ansehen wichtig ist, verbleiben hingegen eher im geschlechtsatypischen Umfeld. Bei Männern können die untersuchten Faktoren nicht erklären, warum auch sie nach dem Abbruch eines geschlechtsatypischen Studiengangs mehrheitlich den geschlechtsatypischen Bildungsweg verlassen.
It's Not Just a Pay Gap: Quantifying The Gender Wage And Pension Gap At a Post-Secondary Institution In Canada
Autor/in:
Smith-Carrier, Tracy; Penner, Marcie; Cecala, Aaron L.; Agocs, Carol
Quelle: Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 51 (2021) 2, S 74–84
Inhalt: What is the impact of the gender pay gap in academia over the course of a career and retirement? To quantify this impact, we used a Canadian post-secondary institution as a case study and simulated the effects of the reported difference in salary across multiple academic career trajectories. A starting wage gap of less than $9,000 resulted in a $300,000-$400,000 gender wage gap over the course of a career, and a further $148,000-$259,000 gender pension gap, for a total gender pension and wage gap of $454,000-$660,000, depending on the rank achieved. Thus, focusing on gender gaps in salary alone leads to a substantial underestimation of the long-term effects of the gender gap.
CEWS Kategorie:Arbeitswelt und Arbeitsmarkt, Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Geschlechterverhältnis
Dokumenttyp:Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Addressing the Gender Pay Gap: The Influence of Female and Male Dominant Disciplines on Gender Pay Equity
Autor/in:
Buckman, David G.; Jackson, Tommy E.
Quelle: Journal of Education Finance, 47 (2021) 1, S 71–91
Inhalt: This study used Kanter's (1997) Tokenism theory to analyze the relationship between gender and faculty salaries in Georgia higher education institutions to determine whether pay inequity existed between male and female professors in 2018. Two separate mixed-effect regression models were estimated on a 2018 cross-sectional survey dataset of Georgia higher education faculty members where faculty demographic characteristics (i.e., gender and academic discipline) were regressed on their annual base salaries. When controlling for demographics and occupational characteristics, female faculty received significantly lower salaries than their male counterparts. In addition, when controlling for academic discipline and grouping those disciplines vis-a-vis male dominant and female dominant, males in female-dominant disciplines earned significantly more money than females, and females in male-dominant disciplines earned more money than males. Additional findings support negotiable salaries as a significant contributor to higher pay.
Inhalt: Gender equality is a major problem that places women at a disadvantage thereby stymieing economic growth and societal advancement. In the last two decades, extensive research has been conducted on gender related issues, studying both their antecedents and consequences. However, existing literature reviews fail to provide a comprehensive and clear picture of what has been studied so far, which could guide scholars in their future research. Our paper offers a scoping review of a large portion of the research that has been published over the last 22 years, on gender equality and related issues, with a specific focus on business and economics studies. Combining innovative methods drawn from both network analysis and text mining, we provide a synthesis of 15,465 scientific articles. We identify 27 main research topics, we measure their relevance from a semantic point of view and the relationships among them, highlighting the importance of each topic in the overall gender discourse. We find that prominent research topics mostly relate to women in the workforce-e.g., concerning compensation, role, education, decision-making and career progression. However, some of them are losing momentum, and some other research trends-for example related to female entrepreneurship, leadership and participation in the board of directors-are on the rise. Besides introducing a novel methodology to review broad literature streams, our paper offers a map of the main gender-research trends and presents the most popular and the emerging themes, as well as their intersections, outlining important avenues for future research.
Schlagwörter:business; economics; gender equality; gender research; Geschlechterforschung; literature review; network analysis; text mining; Trend; Wirtschaftswissenschaft
CEWS Kategorie:Arbeitswelt und Arbeitsmarkt, Geschlechterverhältnis