Quelle: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien; Wien (IHS Working Paper, 19), 2020. 34 S
Inhalt: Leaders often have to weigh ethical against monetary consequences. Such situations may evoke psychological costs from being dishonest and dismissing higher monetary benefits for others. In a within-subjects experiment, we analyze such a dilemma. We first measure individual dishonest behavior when subjects report the outcome of a die roll, which determines their payoffs. Subsequently, they act as leaders and report payoffs for a group including themselves. In our main treatment, subjects can apply for leadership, whereas in the control treatment, we assign leadership randomly. Results reveal that women behave more dishonestly as leaders while men behave similarly in both the individual and the group decision. For female leaders, we find that sorting into leadership is not related to individual honesty preferences. In the control we find that female leaders do not increase dishonesty. A followup study reveals that female leaders become more dishonest after assuming leadership, as they align dishonest behavior with their belief on group members' honesty preferences.
Wandel und Persistenz beruflicher Exklusionsprozesse in der chemischen Industrie: zur sozialen Schließung von Tätigkeitsfeldern über das Ungleichheitsmerkmal Geschlecht in historischer Perspektive
Titelübersetzung:Change and persistence of professional exclusion processes in the chemical industry: on the social closure of career fields throug the inequality characteristic of gender in a historical perspective
Autor/in:
Horstmann, Anna
Quelle: AIS-Studien, 13 (2020) 2, S 28-42
Inhalt: Der Beitrag untersucht den Wandel von In- und Exklusionsmechanismen von Frauen aus der Chemieindustrie von 1900 bis 1990 in einem interdisziplinären unternehmens- und epochenübergreifenden Vergleich anhand des Konzepts der sozialen Schließung nach Max Weber. Um die soziologische Theorie der sozialen Schließung von Berufsfeldern jedoch für die Sozialgeschichte nutzbar zu machen, bedarf es einer Operationalisierung dieses Konzepts. Mithilfe der Dimensionen der sozialen Ungleichheit zwischen den Geschlechtern nach Nancy Fraser können Schließungs- und Wandlungsprozesse über einen langen Zeitraum miteinander in Bezug gesetzt und nachvollzogen werden. Anhand einer Fallstudie zu Chemikerinnen und Laborantinnen in der deutschen Chemieindustrie zwischen 1900 und 1990 wird exemplarisch skizziert, wie sich Webers Theorie für eine interdisziplinär angelegte Sozialgeschichte praktisch umsetzen lässt.
Schlagwörter:chemische Industrie; chemical industry; woman; Inklusion; inclusion; Exklusion; exclusion; historische Entwicklung; historical development; Weber, M.; Weber, M.; soziale Schließung; social discrimination; gender-specific factors; soziale Ungleichheit; social inequality; Sozialgeschichte; social history
SSOAR Kategorie:Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Sozialgeschichte, historische Sozialforschung
Quelle: Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, (2020) 65, S 1-49
Inhalt: Research consistently reports pronounced earnings differences between men and women, even among the highly educated. This article investigates whether students' responsiveness to information on income returns relates to gender differences in major choices, which might contribute to the persistent gender wage gap. We use field-experimental panel data on students in Berlin (Germany), starting one year before high school graduation. Our intervention comprised information on major-specific returns to college and was provided to students in randomly selected schools. By comparing the major-specific application decisions of "treated" and "untreated" high school seniors, we examine whether, and why, male and female students respond differently to this information. As potential mechanisms behind a gender-specific treatment effect, we analyze the role of gender stereotypes and roles associated with certain job attributes. We find that providing income information on college majors only influences the major choices of male (not female) students with college intention: treated male students on average applied to majors associated with higher mean income. Further analyses suggest that this gender difference in the treatment effect cannot be explained by differential distributions or effects of preferred job attributes.
Schlagwörter:choice of studies; Stereotyp; Berufswahl; decision making criterion; gender role; Einkommensunterschied; Federal Republic of Germany; stereotype; occupational choice; Geschlechtsrolle; difference in income; Entscheidungskriterium; Lohnhöhe; wage level; gender-specific factors; Studienwahl; college major choice; field experiment; gender inequality; information; monetary returns
SSOAR Kategorie:Berufsforschung, Berufssoziologie, Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung
Afrikanische Im/Mobilisierungen im Umgang mit Covid-19: intersektionale Politiken der Sorge an der Schnittstelle von Geschlecht, Klasse und Postkolonialität
Autor/in:
Hasenöhrl, Synthia
Quelle: Femina Politica - Zeitschrift für feministische Politikwissenschaft, 29 (2020) 2, S 119-120